No wonder victims and their allies want to "name and shame" abusers. Often it is the only route to justice, and to ultimately changing the culture that enables abuse.
This is a lot of food for thought. Especially as someone who literally received none of the due process mandates from the(at the time) new Trump era title ix regs. It’s also a firm who mainly represents the accused in due process claims who has given the biggest chance to my case for contingency. Maybe what is needed, at least in academia, is what I actually think circumstances like mine, and others, have to offer...a meeting point where due process for all parties along with more wins for “heightened risk” /“pre-assault” claims occur —because those claims refocus justice on the institutions that enable, nurture cultures where it occurs. Too often the law keeps over correcting when it comes to title ix. That’s because the institutions that enforce them are more concerned with their best interests. I’m still learning so much. I hope that made sense.
This is a lot of food for thought. Especially as someone who literally received none of the due process mandates from the(at the time) new Trump era title ix regs. It’s also a firm who mainly represents the accused in due process claims who has given the biggest chance to my case for contingency. Maybe what is needed, at least in academia, is what I actually think circumstances like mine, and others, have to offer...a meeting point where due process for all parties along with more wins for “heightened risk” /“pre-assault” claims occur —because those claims refocus justice on the institutions that enable, nurture cultures where it occurs. Too often the law keeps over correcting when it comes to title ix. That’s because the institutions that enforce them are more concerned with their best interests. I’m still learning so much. I hope that made sense.